you'll also love

Join the Pack

Sign up for our quarterly Newf-Letter to stay up to date with your favorite pack of Newfoundlands

12 Comments

  1. I really enjoyed this one. I’m recessive-gene-averse due to health concerns but, as you say, that’s more to do with the way people behave around breeding than the inherent nature of genetics. Thanks for the article!

    1. Thanks for your comment! I wish more people would be open to the possibility it’s the lack of proper breeding practices and not something that can always be blamed on the genetics.

  2. I enjoyed this article my two Newfoundlands just had puppies and we had three puppies that are grey. And both parents are AKC. We were shocked and now decided to keep the two females that are grey not to breed but as pets cause they are beautiful and can’t wait to see them get older.

    1. Congratulations on your litter!
      Grey is a beautiful color in Newfies. I remember the first time I saw one was at a dog show in Michigan when I was a kid. I’ve wanted a grey ever since!

  3. Great article. I have a dilute brown and white puppy. Her father is dilute brown solid and her mother is brown and white. I researched her breeder and found her to be quite ethical and responsible. She did a wisdom panel on her and all results were normal. She does seem more long legged and lankier like the European landseers. At four months, she is not as fuzzy as my black one was at her age. It will be interesting to see what she looks like as an adult.

    1. Thank you!
      I’m not familiar with a wisdom panel, I’ll have to do some research on it.
      As puppies grow, they turn into awkward looking teenagers before they finish maturing. The long legs and lankiness should correct itself. And the less fuzz could just be because she has less hair. Dogs, like people, all have different traits that are expressed 🙂 I hope she grows into everything you have hoped for!

  4. Based on your article, your knowledge & opinions somewhat differ from mine. Any breed’s standard exists for a reason – so the animal (for our discussion – dogs – & particularly Newfies) looks & performs a certain way that the original breed developers determined to be best for their purposes. The “looks” are NOT just the aesthetically eye pleasing aspects, but contribute to the performance of duties expected from the dog. What if a Newfie was born with SHORT HAIR? Or Dwarfism? Or a naturally bobbed tail? Would you think that it’d be OK to breed THOSE dogs back into the population – regardless of what color they were born? Those examples would be hard-put to perform the original duties & under the original conditions for which Newfies were developed.
    In many species, color does/can translate to differences in “performance” … some comparatively for the better … some … not-so-much.
    You seem to be “TOO LENIENT & ACCEPTING” of less than desirable examples of your breed – even if at this time it is only color – which in the long run could work to it’s detriment.

    1. Based on your comment it seems entirely possible you did not read the article I wrote.

      My article had nothing to do with actual defects of a dog. The examples you gave of short hair, dwarfism, and a naturally bobbed tail are all defects.

      Do I think it’s acceptable to breed dogs with those defects you listed or other true defects? Absolutely not. Those would be a detriment to the breed if bred.

      The article was about the genetics of what causes coat color and my opinion that people, like you, that think the coat color in Newfies causes them to perform their breed duties differently are wrong. Color is not a defect. Even the breed standard has a section on color that says, “color is secondary to type, structure, and soundness.” While it does go on to list acceptable colors being black, brown, grey, and white and black, this acceptability applies to the show ring since you can register other colors that are not those via the AKC. You can even earn AKC and NCA titles with other colors outside of the show ring.

      By you saying color affects their ability or lack of ability to perform their breed duties is the equivalent of saying any race due to skin color are less than desirable examples of humanity and therefore unable to hold a job simply because of their skin color.

      I’m not understanding how the aesthetic looks of a dog in terms of color can affect their performance of breed duties. Can you tell me how a beige Newfoundland would be unable to pull a cart or rescue someone from the water if it were trained to the same standard as a black Newfoundland?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *